December 21st, 2017 4:00pm
"The instigator of a crime is worse than he who perpetrates it”- John Bouvier, Bouvier’s Law Dictionary
Since 1991 justices and judges of the United States have used their position of trust to betray their creators, the American people, by overriding their will as declared at Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution, that all judicial officers of the United States shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution, and thereby legislating the Constitution out of the legal process.
What this means is that at some pint in time the oath that binds judges and justices to the United States Constitution had been altered removing the promise to uphold it. The result rendered the Constitution dead and the Bush administration in full control of all three branches of government via the DOJ.
Here is the original oath of 1789: I,______, do solemnly swear or affirm, that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _______, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.
December 1st 1990 Congress alters oath effective March 1st 1991: I, ___ ___, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.’
As minute a detail as it may seem, the difference between "agreeably" and "under" takes loyalty away from the American people and gives it completely, from a legal perspective, to the will of the puppet Congress. Former judicial-branch officers are now legislative-branch officers under the exclusive control of Congress.
The 1990 oath, 104 Stat. 5124, severs the connection between the federal judiciary and the Constitution; meaning: As of March 1, 1991, officers of the federal judiciary have no obligation to discharge or perform the duties of their respective offices “agreeably to the Constitution”.
it is the beliefe of the writer that George H. W. Bush was the instigator of this takeover. As seen in the years to come, the American people have been robbed of their birthright for the benefit of those few in control. In essence this act of congress made George H.W. Bush the King of the United States. It created a monarchy. King George of the United States. No other president achieved such monumental status.
It is this writers opinion that this is when the Bush cabal took hold. Although the traitor Bush family was involved in WW1 and WW2 from a financial point, this soft coup had taken place in the White House and no one even noticed. Hook, line, and sinker.
Since March 1991 no justice or judge of the United States is bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution—only the laws of the United States, i.e., the statutes of Congress. All federal cases are in fact null and void for simply altering the oath to preclude the laws of the Constitution.
Any justice or judge of the United States who enters a decision or judgment in a federal case without the authority to exercise “The judicial Power of the United States,” Constitution, Art. III, § 1—and this includes every Supreme Court decision and United States District Court judgment since March 1, 1991—does so without the authority of the Constitution and thereby denies the litigants due process of law and manufactures a void judgment.
Bottom line: A judge is a municipal judge of the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation, “a Federal corporation, ” 28 U.S.C. § 3002(15), doing business as “United States,” and under the exclusive control of Congress and knowingly and willfully usurping exercise of general jurisdiction outside his territory (the District of Columbia) and culpable for treason to the Constitution.
The judicial system of the United States is populated by justices and judges who despise or would prefer to eliminate the Constitution from their brand of jurisprudence.
Seventh Circuit judge Richard Posner is quoted in this article saying "I see absolutely no value to a judge of spending decades, years, months, weeks, days, hours, minutes, or seconds studying the Constitution, the history of its enactment, its amendments, and its implementation (across the centuries — well, just a little more than two centuries, and of course less for many of the amendments),” he wrote. “Eighteenth-century guys, however smart, could not foresee the culture, technology, etc., of the 21st century.”
What he means is the founding fathers could not foresee King George taking control of the high office like he did rendering judges as mere puppets to the policy of the New World Order. All that study would be a waste of time I suppose.
Think about that one for a while. Here, this writer includes the artifact from which this article is written.
©2018 T3 – TELL THE TRUTH