February 7th, 2019 9:00am
This is a letter consisting of comments and questions directed toward a specific member of congress, Kyrsten Sinema. She voted "YEA" in support of the following.
Recently the Senate passed a bill entitled S.1 - Strengthening America's Security in the Middle East Act of 2019. "To make improvements to certain defense and security assistance provisions and to authorize the appropriation of funds to Israel, to reauthorize the United States-Jordan Defense Cooperation Act of 2015, and to halt the wholesale slaughter of the Syrian people, and for other purposes."
The sponsor of this bill is Marco Rubio.
There are issues within this bill that would imply humanitarian rights violations on many levels.
The concern of the author is that of "and for other purposes."
The "other purposes" are laid out in TITLE IV—COMBATING BDS ACT OF 2019 // SEC. 402. NONPREEMPTION OF MEASURES BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO DIVEST FROM ENTITIES THAT ENGAGE IN CERTAIN BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, OR SANCTIONS ACTIVITIES TARGETING ISRAEL OR PERSONS DOING BUSINESS IN ISRAEL OR ISRAELI-CONTROLLED TERRITORIES.
Don't you just love how Rubio threw this in there? Do you think Marco Rubio is shilling for the Zionists?
The key wording here is "ENTITIES".
Definition of Legal Entity: An association, corporation, partnership, proprietorship, trust, or individual that has legal standing in the eyes of law. A legal entity has legal capacity to enter into agreements or contracts, assume obligations, incur and pay debts, sue and be sued in its own right, and to be held responsible for its actions.
A corporation is a legal "entity" created through the laws of its state of incorporation, treating a corporation as a legal "person" that has standing to sue and be sued.
Black's Law Dictionary defines a corporation as: "an association of shareholders (or even a single shareholder) created under law and regarded as an artificial person by courts, "having a legal entity entirely separate and distinct from the individuals who compose it, with the capacity of continuous existence or succession, and having the capacity of such legal entity, of taking, holding and conveying property, suing and being sued, and execising such other powers as may be conferred on it by law, just as a natural person may."
UNITED STATES CODE Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C). It is stated that the UNITED STATES is a corporation. The corporation is not a separate and distinct entity from the government. It is the government.
We the People are corporate franchises governed by contract law via Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
Contract law is above the Constitution and under the jurisdiction of Equity/Admiralty courts (UCC), so the governments began to contract with everyone.
We the People are considered "entities".
So when Rubio says this "The Combating B.D.S. Act does not infringe on Americans’ First Amendment rights or prohibit their right to engage in boycotts. By design, it focuses on business entities — not individuals"- you know exactly what his long range plans are.
This is how they do it.
This will be the slow dissolve of our 1st Amendment rights to protest, assemble, religious freedom, and freedom of speech.
Reader, we must get involved. These traitors to the flag must be stopped before it's too late.
The letter follows:
Hello Kyrsten Sinema,
Over the years I've witnessed the slow dissolve of our nations culture, health, economy, environment, education system and constitutional authority, all for the personal political glory of those whose ideals do not belong in our government.
This is a Republic, not a dictatorship. Our government leadership is elected by the People. It was created to work for the uplifting of the People- "promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity".
Constitution Preamble: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
On the front page of your website is states the following: "Kyrsten feels a duty to serve and give back to the country that gave her so much. She got her shot at the American dream, and she’ll keep working to make sure all Arizonans get theirs too".
Don't you realize that by voting "YEA" to S.1 - Strengthening America's Security in the Middle East Act of 2019, you just sold a huge chunk of Constitutional America to a foreign power, namely Israel? You just voted to support thee most racist, terror driven nation on the planet.
Not only that, under TITLE IV—COMBATING BDS ACT OF 2019, you countered our civil rights- Bill of Rights Amendment I states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
S.1 is in direct violation of American sovereignty.
S.1 is a human rights violation.
S.1 promotes terrorism directly and by proxy.
S.1 will further degrade our nation by allowing a foreign lobby to intrude upon our way of life via the US legislature.
Kyrsten, we People of the united States of America have suffered enough. We are struggling to live this "American Dream" you talk about. The bill you just sponsored will make it harder for us to do this.
Worst of all, this bill will set a precedent that will completely destroy our 1st Amendment in due time.
SEC. 402. NONPREEMPTION OF MEASURES BY STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS TO DIVEST FROM ENTITIES THAT ENGAGE IN CERTAIN BOYCOTT, DIVESTMENT, OR SANCTIONS ACTIVITIES TARGETING ISRAEL OR PERSONS DOING BUSINESS IN ISRAEL OR ISRAELI-CONTROLLED TERRITORIES.
An ambitious attorney will exploit this in a court of law, arguing the case to a bewildered Judge who will decide antithetically, against our rights.
SEC 402, by any measure, is one of thee most important attributes of the S.1 bill. It will ultimately destroy our right to freedom of speech and right to protest.
To understand this process of dissolve better, please refer to Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938).
In this case the Supreme Court set a precedent that destroyed all other case law that had been established prior to 1938. It was right after that case that lawmakers began creating the Uniform Commercial Code. The UCC is now the new law of the land as far as the courts are concerned. By the 1960's all states had passed the UCC into law. The states had no choice but to adopt the very unconstitutional Uniform Commercial Code as the law of the land.
We the People ultimately lost our right to not only use but to even recite Constitutional authority in all court cases today without being threatened with contempt.
Before you joined congress:
You organized many antiwar rallies by the time the Iraq War began.
You opposed the war in Afghanistan.
You led a group of protesters in 2003 to Patriot's Square Park in Phoenix and distributed flyers denouncing the US involvement in the middle east.
You declared in 2003 that Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush were "'the real Saddam and Osama lovers'".
Since you joined congress:
You became a hawk on military spending and defense, proclaiming you would do "whatever it takes".
You boast that you will fight for "billions for military spending."
You support our involvement in the middle east.
You voted to empower a terrorist nation- Israel.
You voted to forego our civil rights.
Kyrsten, you are a lawyer. Do you not have the foresight to see how this is going to go?
The People don't want to support terrorism. We don't approve of the billions of dollars spent in support of the racist leanings of the Israeli government. We do not want any law on the books that even hint at Bill of Rights violations.
Would you please explain to me why you found it necessary to support S.1 and all of it's anti-American mandates?
Believe nothing, believe everything.
©2019 T3 – TELL THE TRUTH