August 12th, 2018 11:00am
The United Nations was enacted in 1945 with the Rothschild banking family as the lead proponent from Europe and the Rockefeller clan in New York. The world had been at war for far too long, fomented by the Rothschilds, naturally, and the global family wanted peace.
As we know the advocacy of war can only be ruined by an opponent. This is the natural progression of things in our world. It's part of our evolution as intelligent beings. On a mundane level, when there's a problem, we solve it. If we can't solve it we at least try to minimize it.
In this story, war, is the protagonist. The United Nations, is the antagonist.
One thing is deeply disturbing already. The pro and the con is the same instigator.
For the sake of this expose, the author will use the French revolution as a starting point.
From this point forward, the banking families have been fomenting war for profit. This includes every skirmish since. From the French revolution and the Napoleonic wars, to the American war of independence, the war of 1812, the American Civil War, the Bolshevik revolution, WWI, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, Middle East, etc, etc, etc.
None of these wars were natural. They were planned years in advance, in progression, to sell the public on the idea of global government with one of many objectives being, to mitigate hostilities between nations and to ultimately control war and peace.
So finally after hundreds of years of war, the United Nations comes in to spare the world in 1945.
Here is a list of companies associated with the UN-
For further discovery see a plethora of other associates here.
The Rothschild banking family and the Rockefeller clan created to United Nations, who's central office is in New York City USA, to moderate the wars they created.
A new kind of war, a new kind of mitigation, "global warming".
In 1988 the United Nations creates the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC. Its mission is to provide comprehensive scientific assessments of current scientific, technical and socio-economic information worldwide about the risk of climate change more specifically Anthropogenic (manmade) Climate Change.
Interestingly enough, the IPCC does not conduct scientific research themselves. They rely exclusively on information from other sources.
So what this means is, the IPCC interprets the data in a way that fits their agenda. And what is their narrative? Anthropogenic climate change.
The IPCC wants the global community to believe that they are the cause of global warming. We hear about it on the radio, see it on TV and in all media and internet. This narrative is promoted at gradeschool thru college levels. There is a scientific community of tens of thousands of personnel dedicated to this narrative.
If global warming is false then why are "leading" scientists and our schools pushing it down our throats?
Because that's where the funding is. If you promote the narrative then you get the funding. If you go against the narrative you don't get the funding and you're ridiculed and called a crazy quack-job.
In 2007, IPCC climatologists admit to having a “low” or “very low” understanding of 13 of the 15 factors that drive climate. So in other words they only know what they are doing 13.3% of the time yet they want us to trust them and completely change the entire world’s energy production system at a cost of untold trillion$ of dollars because they just might be correct. Just to prove a theory, most scientists require over 90% certainty before they even look at it.
Thank goodness POTUS took us out of the Paris Agreement.
This whole time the IPCC was pushing that Co2 was driving the heat index. This was a serious flaw which has led to much wasted effort and a lot of confusion in the world’s science and engineering communities. Instead of working on producing energy which we need, we are working on reducing CO2 which either increases the cost or reduces the supply of energy and is therefore counter productive.
CO2 driving temperature had already been proven false almost 60 years prior.
In 1951, long before the creation of the IPCC, the American Meteorological Society (AMS) said this about the idea that CO2 could alter the climate- “was never widely accepted and was abandoned when it was found that all the long-wave radiation [that would be] absorbed by CO2 is [already] absorbed by water vapor.”
Only 1% of the earth's atmosphere consists of green house gasses. Of that 1%, 95% of it is water vapor. Water vapor is a green house gas, yes. Of the 5% green house gasses left, after the water vapor is removed, 80% is naturally occurring. So manmade greenhouse gas production is something like .02% of the total global greenhouse accumulation in our atmosphere.
Prior to the founding of the IPCC there was little to no support for the theory that CO2 was causing planetary change. They and the "paid to play" scientific community are trying to prove that CO2 is the cause of the climate change. They are by design steering the ship in that direction.
Remember, they're mission is to specifically prove the case for anthropogenic (manmade) climate change.
After wasting billion$, constricting regulations impeding progress, imposing unnecessary carbon taxes which drive up consumer prices and a multitude of other subsequent aftershocks, turns out CO2 is not the cause of global warming/climate change, whatever you want to call it.
An interesting yet absurd tidbit-
According to the US Supreme Court and the EPA, CO2 in the atmosphere must be regulated, Massachusetts v. EPA. Since an average human creates close to .4 metric tons of CO2 per year just by breathing, we are all in violation of this regulation.
CO2 is food for plat life. The more CO2 the faster they grow.
If we are trying to control the natural changes in CO2 levels without understanding why, we may just be setting ourselves up for catastrophic failure.
It has been proven that CO2 follows temperature, not the other way around as proposed by the IPCC. So if CO2 is on the rise, maybe it should be and is the natural response to help plant life overcome what may be trending, unbeknown to us.
While Europe is pushing the 2 degrees Celsius ceiling, UEA climate scientist, Professor Jones, admits that no scientific basis was ever established for this target. Jones admits- “The 2 deg C limit is talked about by a lot within Europe. It is never defined though what it means…. I know you don’t know the answer, but I don’t either! I think it is plucked out of thin air.”
Let's move on to the subject of theory Peer Review. In the words of David Pristash, BBA, EMBA- "A requirement of the Peer Review process is that when a "theory" is presented for review, all the information, data and programs used to make that theory are also subject to the review by others (peers) in the "field" to try and prove the theory might be wrong".
This hasn't happened. As a matter of fact the IPCC took information from it's sources, (remember they don't do research) a theory that had been laid to rest half a century earlier, and tried to prove it "right".
They set out to prove it right!
DP continues- "Not only has that not happened in this case but worse it now appears that the original information used to create a "key" temperature base was intentionally destroyed. That, in itself is cause to totally reject the claims by those that promote this anthropogenic CO2 concept".
This is an outright scandal.
Readers, many of the world’s governments are involved in this intentional deceit either directly or indirectly. The Pairs Agreement gives us a very informative perspective of pure horse manure. 100% corruption at the top levels of the scientific community, political leadership and propagandized by an irresponsible media in all forms.
THE UNITED NATIONS
The world’s climate has never has been 100% stable. As a matter of fact the last 10K years has been about as stable as we humans have ever known. This era is known as the Holocene epoch and has allowed man to settle down. Agriculture sprung from this somewhat constant climate and has fortuned civilizations thereby promoting our current state of modern urban living. Before this there were wild fluctuations from glacial freeze to cold. As a matter of fact we have seen even hotter temps than we face now in just the past few thousand years.
This my friends is called paleo-climatology. Funny, today's "paid to play" scientists, to prove their global warming narrative, only go back to 1850, the year they invented the thermometer.
Reader, they depend on us being as dumb as a box of rocks. The UN and their cohorts thought they had dummed us down enough. Not so, some of us are paying attention.
Look, the fact remains. The Rothschild's and their plan to globalize the population using whatever means necessary is out in the open for all of us to see. The blatant lies and corruption at such high levels of leadership has brought us to this chapter in our story.
When will enough be enough?
Lash out, be irreverent and irrational with these lunatics. These people are psychopaths. They do not deserve to live amongst us. They need to be locked up for good.
All the anguish and guilt imposed on our precious children as early as kindergarten. Felling guilty just to be alive, killing the planet.....
One other thing to think about. These families are the ones who created this world of fossil fuels. Nikola Tesla invented free energy and DC powered auto's before the gas guzzlers came out. These families stopped Tesla and all of his experimentation. They didn't want clean burning free energy. They wanted us stuck on fossil fuels for life. And why wouldn't they, they owned all the energy plants, oil refineries, etc.. and they still do.
Here are a few good reads proving the false global warming sham-
Zbiggniew Jaworowski- CO2: The Greatest Scientific Scandal of our Time
Nir J. Shaviv- 20th Century global warming ‘There is nothing new under the Sun
Frank Lansner- Holocene, historic and recent global temperatures from temperature proxies
Don J. Easterbrook- Geologic Evidence of the Cause of Global Warming and Cooling --- Are We Heading for Global Catastrophe?
Believe nothing, believe everything.
©2020 T3 – TELL THE TRUTH